Sicario (2015), directed by Denis Villeneuve and written by Taylor Sheridan, is a gripping crime thriller that delves into the world of drug cartels and the murky moral landscape of law enforcement’s fight against them. With a taut script, intense performances, and a haunting atmosphere, the film’s finale is as impactful as it is thought-provoking.
In this article, we will take a deep dive into the movie’s conclusion, analyzing how the different characters’ fates unfold, the underlying themes at play, and the significance of the ending in the broader narrative of the film. This detailed exploration will provide clarity for those who may have been left unsettled or curious about the closing moments of Sicario.
Introduction to Sicario
Released in 2015, Sicario is a crime thriller centered around Kate Macer (Emily Blunt), an idealistic FBI agent who becomes involved in a covert government task force designed to combat Mexican drug cartels. The film opens with a horrifying discovery made by Macer and her team during a raid in Arizona: dozens of bodies buried within the walls of a cartel safe house.
Her investigation into the drug trade eventually leads her to work alongside a mysterious and morally ambiguous government task force led by Matt Graver (Josh Brolin) and an enigmatic former prosecutor turned assassin, Alejandro Gillick (Benicio del Toro). As Macer becomes entangled in their operations, the line between good and evil begins to blur, and the motivations of those around her become increasingly suspect.
The Journey Toward the Finale
Throughout Sicario, Kate Macer represents the ethical voice of law enforcement, struggling to maintain her moral compass in a world where the rule of law often seems irrelevant. However, as the film progresses, it becomes clear that she is merely a pawn in a much larger game being played by Graver and Gillick.
Graver’s task force, which operates with minimal oversight, is not just trying to dismantle the cartel operations in Mexico but is also engaging in tactics that skirt legality and ethics. Alejandro, the so-called “sicario” (the Spanish word for hitman), is introduced as a mysterious figure with a personal vendetta against the cartel, particularly its leader Fausto Alarcón. As Kate follows them deeper into the operation, her sense of justice and morality is constantly challenged by the actions of her colleagues.
The Building Tension
One of the key elements leading up to the finale of Sicario is the tension that builds between Kate and the task force she has become a part of. The mission they are on is shrouded in secrecy, and the tactics used by Graver and Alejandro are increasingly disturbing to Kate, who is committed to following the letter of the law. As they cross the border into Mexico, the film shifts in tone, becoming darker and more intense.
The film’s portrayal of Ciudad Juárez, with its lawlessness and extreme violence, serves as a stark contrast to Kate’s own sense of order and justice. As Kate witnesses more and more morally questionable actions, she begins to realize that she is in over her head. Graver and Alejandro are working toward a goal that is much more personal than what she originally believed.
See also: What Happened to Alejandro’s Family in Sicario?
The Climax: Alejandro’s Mission
The climax of Sicario revolves around Alejandro’s true motives. We learn that he is not just a member of the task force but has a deeply personal vendetta against Fausto Alarcón, the cartel leader responsible for ordering the brutal murder of Alejandro’s wife and daughter.
In the final act of the film, Alejandro, with Graver’s tacit approval, embarks on a personal mission of revenge. He infiltrates Alarcón’s heavily guarded estate and executes his family, leaving only Fausto himself for the final confrontation. In a chilling scene, Alejandro sits down at the dinner table with Alarcón’s family, coldly and methodically executing each member before finally killing Fausto.
This sequence is notable for its tension and the moral ambiguity it presents. Alejandro’s actions are horrific, yet understandable in the context of his loss. His quest for vengeance blurs the lines between justice and murder, leaving the audience to question whether his actions can be justified.
Alejandro Confronts Kate
Following the massacre of Fausto Alarcón and his family, the film reaches its emotional and moral peak in a confrontation between Alejandro and Kate. Back in the United States, Alejandro arrives at Kate’s apartment, where he forces her at gunpoint to sign a waiver stating that the mission she was a part of was legal and sanctioned. This moment is the ultimate betrayal for Kate, who believed she was working to uphold the law, only to realize that the operation was anything but lawful.
Alejandro’s cold, calculating demeanor during this scene is a stark contrast to Kate’s emotional vulnerability. He tells her that the world she is trying to live in – one of clear-cut moral boundaries – does not exist. He explains that the people in charge do not care about justice, only about maintaining control and eliminating threats. In this world, Alejandro asserts, the rule of law is irrelevant, and violence is the only real currency.
This confrontation leaves Kate shattered, both emotionally and ethically. The man she thought was a government ally is revealed to be an assassin with no qualms about manipulating her to achieve his goals. Alejandro’s final words to her, “You should move to a small town, somewhere the rule of law still exists,” are a chilling reminder of the corrupt and violent world in which they operate.
The Final Scene: The Soccer Match
Sicario ends with a haunting and poignant final scene. After the confrontation between Kate and Alejandro, the film shifts back to Mexico, where we see a group of children playing soccer in a dusty field. The game is interrupted by the sound of gunfire in the distance – a stark reminder of the violence that pervades their everyday lives.
This final image serves as a powerful metaphor for the cycle of violence that grips the region. The children continue playing despite the violence, perhaps desensitized to the constant threat of death and destruction. It’s a somber note to end on, underscoring the idea that the battle against the drug cartels is far from over and that innocent lives continue to be affected by the ongoing conflict.
The Themes of Sicario’s Ending
The ending of Sicario is not just about the resolution of the plot but also about the broader themes that the film explores. The moral ambiguity of the characters, the corrupting influence of power, and the futility of traditional law enforcement methods in the face of such overwhelming violence are all key themes that come to a head in the final moments of the film.
Moral Ambiguity and Compromise
Throughout the film, Kate is presented as the moral center of the story, a by-the-book FBI agent who believes in upholding the law at all costs. However, the events of the movie force her to confront the harsh reality that, in the world of drug cartels, there are no clear-cut good guys or bad guys. Alejandro, who at first seems to be an ally, is revealed to be a man driven by vengeance rather than justice. Graver, who is ostensibly working for the government, is willing to bend and break the rules to achieve his goals.
The ending forces the audience to grapple with the same moral dilemmas that Kate faces. Is it acceptable to use immoral means to achieve a greater good? Is Alejandro’s quest for vengeance justifiable, even if it involves the murder of innocent people? The film offers no easy answers, leaving these questions open for interpretation.
The Cycle of Violence
The film’s final scene, with the children playing soccer amidst the sound of gunfire, drives home the idea that violence is a constant presence in the world of Sicario. The drug war is not something that can be easily solved or contained; it is a self-perpetuating cycle that affects everyone, from government officials to innocent civilians.
Alejandro’s actions, while seemingly justified on a personal level, do nothing to stop the violence. In fact, they may even contribute to it. The death of Fausto Alarcón may remove one cartel leader, but it does not dismantle the cartel itself. Someone else will likely take his place, and the violence will continue.
Power and Control
Another key theme of the film’s ending is the corrupting influence of power. Graver and Alejandro represent a shadowy world where the usual rules of engagement do not apply. They operate outside the boundaries of the law, using whatever means necessary to achieve their objectives. In this world, power is not about justice or morality but about control. Alejandro’s ability to manipulate Kate into signing the waiver is a stark reminder of how powerless she is in the face of such overwhelming forces.
Conclusion
The ending of Sicario is bleak and unsettling, but it is also a fitting conclusion to the film’s exploration of moral ambiguity, violence, and power. Kate Macer, who starts the film as a principled law enforcement officer, ends it as a broken woman, forced to confront the harsh reality that the system she believes in is deeply flawed.
Alejandro, on the other hand, achieves his goal of vengeance but at a great personal cost. His actions raise important questions about the nature of justice and the lengths to which one should go to achieve it.
The final scene, with the children playing soccer amidst the sound of gunfire, serves as a haunting reminder that the battle against the drug cartels is far from over. The cycle of violence will continue, and innocent lives will continue to be affected. Sicario offers no easy answers, but its ending is a powerful commentary on the moral complexities of the drug war and the human cost of violence.
Related topic:
Which Sicario Movie Is Better?
Where Can I See the Film Sicario?
How Many Sicario Movies Are There?