Advertisements
Home Movie John Wick 4’s Action Brutally Slammed: Disgusting Beyond Belie

John Wick 4’s Action Brutally Slammed: Disgusting Beyond Belie

by Barbara

Platoon Director Criticizes the Excessive Brutality and Lack of Substance

In the highly anticipated John Wick 4, action aficionados were expecting another adrenaline-fueled ride with breathtaking stunts and intense fight sequences. However, the film has recently come under fire, facing harsh criticism from none other than Oliver Stone, the renowned director of Platoon and Natural Born Killers. Stone’s scathing critique of John Wick 4’s action sequences has left fans and industry insiders in shock. Let’s delve into the points he raised and explore whether this criticism holds merit.

1. A Feast of Brutality: An Excessive and Gratuitous Display

Stone describes John Wick 4’s action as “disgusting beyond belief.” While fans have come to expect violence in the franchise, Stone argues that the latest installment crosses a line by reveling in excessive brutality without offering any redeeming qualities. He argues that the constant onslaught of gore and aggression desensitizes the audience, numbing them to the real consequences of violence.

Advertisements

2. Style Over Substance: Action at the Expense of Storytelling

Stone takes issue with the film’s heavy reliance on action, claiming that it comes at the expense of meaningful storytelling. He argues that John Wick 4 sacrifices character development and a compelling narrative for the sake of dazzling fight choreography. In his eyes, the film is more concerned with impressing audiences with its slick action sequences than engaging them on an emotional level.

Advertisements

3. Lack of Innovation: Repetitive and Formulaic

Another criticism leveled by Stone is the lack of innovation in John Wick 4’s action. He claims that the film offers little in terms of fresh ideas or unique approaches to combat scenes. Stone suggests that the franchise has become trapped in a cycle of repetitive violence, recycling the same formula without pushing the boundaries of creativity. He argues that this lack of innovation undermines the potential impact the film could have had.

Advertisements

4. Glossing Over Consequences: Ignoring the Reality of Violence

Stone highlights the film’s tendency to downplay the consequences of violence. While action movies often portray violence in an exaggerated manner, he argues that John Wick 4 takes it to a new extreme, where characters sustain severe injuries and yet continue to fight with seemingly superhuman resilience. This unrealistic portrayal, according to Stone, further desensitizes audiences and fails to address the real-world consequences of violence.

5. Disconnect from Reality: Escapism at Its Worst

Stone criticizes John Wick 4 for perpetuating a dangerous form of escapism. He argues that the film’s relentless violence and disregard for the consequences of actions send a troubling message to audiences. By creating a world where the protagonist can commit extreme acts of violence without facing any lasting repercussions, Stone believes the film blurs the line between fiction and reality, potentially distorting viewers’ perception of violence.

Conclusion: An Uncomfortable Reflection of Our Society

While Stone’s criticism of John Wick 4’s action may be harsh, it raises important questions about the impact of violence in cinema and the responsibility filmmakers bear. The franchise’s popularity suggests an appetite for intense action, but it’s crucial to strike a balance between entertainment and thoughtful storytelling. Filmmakers should consider the potential consequences of excessive violence and strive to deliver action sequences that engage audiences without desensitizing them or trivializing the reality of violence. Ultimately, it’s up to the audience to navigate their own relationship with the genre and critically examine the messages it conveys.

In response to Stone’s critique, some argue that John Wick 4’s action is meant to be purely escapist entertainment, and its success lies in its ability to immerse viewers in a thrilling and fantastical world. They contend that audiences are well aware of the fictional nature of the violence depicted and can enjoy it without endorsing or seeking to replicate such behavior in real life.

Moreover, defenders of the franchise argue that the John Wick series has always been unapologetically violent, and that’s precisely what has made it a hit among fans. They assert that the films cater to a specific niche audience who appreciates the over-the-top action and choreography. From this perspective, the franchise is delivering exactly what its target audience desires, and any criticism of its content should be understood within the context of personal taste.

It’s important to acknowledge that opinions on John Wick 4’s action will vary. Some viewers may find the violence thrilling and exhilarating, embracing the escapist nature of the film. Others, however, may share Stone’s concerns regarding the potential desensitization and glorification of violence.

In the end, it is essential to remember that film is a form of artistic expression, and different directors have their own visions and styles. Oliver Stone’s critique serves as a reminder that discussions surrounding violence in cinema should not be dismissed, but rather engaged with critically and thoughtfully.

As audiences, we have the responsibility to approach films, particularly those with intense action, with a discerning eye. It is crucial to reflect on the messages being conveyed, the potential impact on our perceptions, and the broader societal implications. By actively engaging with the media we consume, we can navigate the line between entertainment and social consciousness.

Ultimately, the debate sparked by Oliver Stone’s criticism of John Wick 4’s action prompts a larger conversation about the role of violence in cinema, the responsibilities of filmmakers, and the impact of media on society. While the film industry continues to evolve and cater to diverse tastes, it is vital for creators, audiences, and critics to engage in a constructive dialogue that explores the boundaries of artistic expression while ensuring the ethical portrayal of violence on screen.

RELEATED READING:

Advertisements

You may also like

blank

Rnada is a movie portal. The main columns include trailers, movie reviews, celebrities, movie knowledge, news

Copyright © 2023 Rnada.com