Actor-filmmaker Sasikumar shared advice from superstar Rajinikanth about catering to audience expectations in commercial cinema. He emphasized that filmmakers should honor audience predictions for key moments, ensuring viewers leave satisfied. Unfortunately, this principle falters in Dhana’s “Hitler,” starring Vijay Antony, where the anticipated surprises lack significance and fail to resonate.
The film opens in a village plagued by labor exploitation and inadequate infrastructure, foreshadowing disaster. As the narrative shifts to an upcoming state election, the initial calamity’s impact looms but is soon overshadowed by a predictable plot. Vijay Antony’s character forges a friendship with Redin Kingsley’s character, encountering a series of predictable meet-cutes with the heroine, Riya Suman. These moments feel contrived, and the introduction of a suave Deputy Commissioner and a persuasive Minister fails to inject intrigue into the narrative.
A significant flaw in “Hitler” is its lack of engagement during crucial heist sequences. The thefts unfold too easily, diminishing stakes and rendering the explanations uninspired. By cramming plot revelations into the final act, the film sacrifices emotional weight for rushed clarity, resulting in manufactured urgency that dilutes impactful moments.
Amid the shortcomings, the lighter moments stand out, particularly the romantic subplot between Vijay Antony and Riya Suman. Their chemistry injects charm into the film, showcasing Antony’s growth as an actor. However, this subplot eventually feels overshadowed by the central themes of heists and revenge.
Despite a promising cast and a capable technical team, including composers Vivek-Mervin and cinematographer Naveen Kumar, Dhana’s transition from the successful “Vaanam Kottattum” to “Hitler” feels disappointing. While he demonstrates potential in visual storytelling, many scenes, such as the powerful imagery of counted swindled money, lack substance.
Overall, “Hitler” struggles to fulfill its ambitious narrative. The political commentary lacks depth, and the antagonists fail to convey genuine menace. The film’s title suggests a bold statement, yet it ultimately feels like a missed opportunity, raising questions about the choices made in its execution. As the credits roll, one is left wondering why the filmmakers opted for a predictable path when there was so much potential for depth and complexity.
Related topic:
What Happened to Rosalie in 48 Hours?
What Is Peter Capaldi’s Best Doctor Who Episode?